X Blocks European Commission Account After €120M DSA Fine​

A major regulatory confrontation erupted this week after the European Union imposed a €120 million fine on Elon Musk’s platform X under the Digital Services Act (DSA). In an unprecedented escalation, X responded by blocking the European Commission’s advertising account - a direct retaliation that has pushed US–EU tensions in digital policy to their highest level in years.

EU Issues First-Ever Large Enforcement Fine Under the DSA​

On December 5, the European Commission announced a €120 million enforcement action - the first large-scale fine issued under the EU’s Digital Services Act. Regulators accused X of failing to implement adequate systems for limiting the spread of disinformation and non-compliant political content.

The decision marks a significant milestone: the DSA was designed to impose strict obligations on major platforms, but until now had not been tested with real punitive measures. X became the inaugural case - and the consequences were immediate.

US Government Intervenes: “A Direct Attack on American Technology”​

The fine quickly escalated into a political dispute. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio sharply criticized the EU, describing the ruling as an assault on US tech sovereignty. Rubio stated:

“The €120M fine against X is not simply an attack on a platform - it is an attack by foreign governments on the entire American technology sector and the American people.”

Click to expand...

The statement reflects growing polarization between US and EU policymakers over digital regulation. Washington views Brussels’ aggressive enforcement as economically motivated and strategically targeted. Europe argues it is protecting democratic institutions and public safety.

Elon Musk Responds by Calling for the Dissolution of the EU​

Elon Musk, never one to minimize conflict, responded to the fine with an unusually political statement. He wrote that:

“The EU should be dissolved, and sovereignty returned to individual nations.”

Click to expand...

This is one of Musk’s strongest public criticisms of European regulation to date. His comments fueled an ongoing debate about whether the EU’s regulatory pressure is compatible with the operational reality of multinational tech platforms.

X Takes Counteraction: European Commission Account Blocked​

On December 7, two days after the fine, X enacted a direct retaliation measure: the platform blocked the European Commission’s official advertising account. This account is used for institutional public communication, EU program announcements, and digital outreach campaigns.

The block appears targeted - the Commission’s primary public account remains visible, but promotional operations have been restricted. Analysts interpret this as a calculated demonstration of platform-level power.

Technically, X retains discretion over advertising access. Legally, however, the move raises questions about whether the action itself could fall under the DSA’s anti-interference clauses, potentially triggering further investigation.

Why This Conflict Matters for Global Digital Governance​

The clash between X and the EU is more than a corporate dispute. It highlights deeper trends:

• Major platforms are increasingly willing to defy regulators
• The EU seeks to reshape global digital rules through enforcement
• The US sees European regulation as a strategic threat to its technology sector
• Social networks now operate as geopolitical actors, not just companies

This confrontation signals a future where platforms may openly push back against governments - something historically rare in global communications infrastructure.

For the EU, the conflict is a test of the DSA’s legitimacy. For the US, it is a test of digital sovereignty. For X, it is a defining moment of how far a private platform can go in resisting state-level oversight.

What Happens Next?​

Several outcomes are now possible:

1) The European Commission escalates with additional enforcement
2) The US government increases diplomatic pressure
3) X faces expanded audits under DSA risk frameworks
4) The dispute evolves into a broader EU–US regulatory standoff
5) Other tech platforms reconsider cooperation with EU regulators

Experts warn that this conflict may set a precedent for how digital platforms respond to regulatory penalties worldwide.

Conclusion​

The blocking of an official EU account by X marks a historic turning point in the power dynamics between sovereign institutions and global digital platforms. As Europe asserts its regulatory authority and the US defends its technological dominance, platforms like X find themselves at the center of geopolitical tensions.

This event demonstrates that digital governance is no longer a purely administrative matter - it is now an arena of international political conflict.

---

Editorial Team - CoinBotLab